DRAFT October 18, 2001 Meeting Minutes
University of Idaho, McClure Hall Rm. 411
Members ATtendance
|
X
|
UI: Larry Kirkland,
Facilities Engineer
|
|
WSU:
|
|
X
|
UI: Jay Becker (Chair),
Assistant Director, Utilities and Engineering
|
|
WSU: Pete Grigas,
Facilities Planning
|
|
|
Moscow: Tom Scallorn,
Water Dept. Superintendent
|
X
|
Pullman: Mark Workman,
(Vice Chair) Dir. Public Works
|
|
X
|
Moscow: Steve Busch, City
Council Member
|
X
|
Pullman: Art Garro
|
|
|
Latah County: Loreca
Stauber, County Commissioner
|
|
Whitman County: Jerry
Finch, County Commissioner
|
|
X
|
Latah County: Tom
Townsend, citizen
|
|
Whitman County: Mark
Bordsen, County Planner
|
|
|
|
|
|
VISITORS
Bryony Hansen (Golder Associates Inc.,
CD’A), Scott King (King Groundwater
Science), Joanna Latham (UI Grad
Student), Eddie Teasdale (UI Grad Student)
1.
Call to Order AND APPROVAL of September 20, 2001
Minutes
Jay Becker (Chair) called the meeting to
order at 2:40 PM. Minutes were approved
as presented.
Since several visitors were present, Jay asked for introductions.
2. Idaho Grant – Becker
reviewed the grant proposal to the State.
a. Status - Kirkland reiterated what had been stated previously in the
newspaper, that the legislative money has been retracted by IDWR to help pay
for the 1.5% holdback. Roy Mink was told by Norm Young of IDWR that
the retraction is just temporary and money should be back in the budget next
year. Representative Gary Young was going to talk to Karl Dreher, director of
IDWR, about not taking all the funds. Representative Tom Trail and Senator Gary Schroeder have also written
letters to Karl Dreher & IDWR requesting that only a portion of the grant
be taken so that PBAC could at least continue at a slower pace.
b. How propose to proceed - Kirkland suggested that PBAC try immediately for a small grant to do an expanded water
quality study for the proposed drainage well recharge project. He has talked to Roy Mink about this. The RFP for the small grant projects will go
out shortly. There will be a matching
portion that PBAC will have to provide.
Committee members reacted positively.
Kirkland said he would keep PBAC informed as the grant proposal
proceeded. Kirkland said PBAC should
also consider making a similar try for a small grant to get started on the
Moscow Mt water supply and quality study and the John Bush study of potential
recharge areas between Moscow and Moscow Mt.
In the meantime PBAC should take advantage of the time available between now
and when funds become available for the next step to educate the Palouse Basin
constituency on the various options and deal with the concerns that have been
raised.
3. New Grant Applications - The following are matching grant proposals that PBAC
could apply for to help bridge the gap between now and when the State money
might be restored. Kirkland proposed
that PBAC consider applying to IDWRRI for the three small grants mentioned
above and to USGS for the larger three year grant. The RFPs for all the grants will be out shortly. Kirkland promised to keep the Committee
appraised of options.
a. Water Quality Inventory Project – Kirkland
reported that Idaho DEQ has supplied a box full of
data on water quality measurements from area wells that needs to be reviewed
and synthesized into something usable.
In addition the PBAC library has data from various other studies that
need to be summarized and compared also.
Using a small grant from IDWRRI this summary could be done in a year or
less or the scope could be expanded to include taking additional samples and
putting all the data into a computer model for the basin. The latter could be done as a master’s
thesis. By addressing the water quality
now PBAC will address the touchy water chemistry and microbiology issue largely
separate from the pilot drainage well recharge project. Once the well drilling project starts we do
not want it stopped in the middle by an objection which has not been
addressed. Since water chemistry and
microbiology was only a small part of the proposed pilot drainage well recharge
project, addressing these issue in a separate project should allow more
flexibility in the actual pilot project when the IDWR monies come available.
b. Moscow Mountain Water
Collection Project –
This was originally
proposed to start with the State grant funds this year and then be completed in
a future year. It is a study of runoff in the various drainages by time of year
and the associated water quality to determine how much water could be
environmentally, legally and economically diverted and treated either for
direct use or for recharge to one of the aquifers. Again a small scale IWRRI
project is proposed to review the previous works dealing with this topic, to
set up the plan for gathering the necessary data to complete the project and
then start the actual collection of runoff flows and quality data.
c. Moscow Mountain Front Recharge Areas –
This project would
be supervised by John Bush. A graduate
student would review all the wells along the Moscow Mountain front to determine
the best infiltration areas between Moscow Mt and Moscow. This could be the beginning of several
projects that lead to actual use of Moscow Mountain winter season water for
recharging one or more of the aquifers.
This projects also has considerable potential as an IWRRI small scale project.
d. USGS regional application – This would be an updated
version of a grant proposal Dale Ralston put together two years ago. We plan to revise that proposal and resubmit
it. It would pick up from where the OK
project will finish and cover some areas not covered by the OK research such as
legal issues. Jim Osiensky and Kent
Keller would be invited to make input and participate. Roy Mink thinks that it has a good chance of
success. It would be a three year study
for about $300,000. This grant calls
for 1:1 matching. Since this will
follow the OK project, PBAC could use a portion of the continuation of these
funds for the match. The rest could be
in-kind matching.
4.
EXECUTIVE SECRETARY POSITION – Becker
said he had handed out resumes for three persons and would get the executive
committee together in the coming week to do interviews. He hoped to have a new executive secretary
hired by the next meeting.
5. PBAC
FUNDING DISCUSSION –
Kirkland reviewed the
current funding format whereby basic PBAC expenses are covered
by shares or membership fees and agreements between the major entities on
surcharges are used for funding research projects. He proposed that PBAC consider a new funding format whereby the
entities continue to fund basic PBAC expenses by shares as is currently done
but all other expenses be paid on the basis of a charge for how much Grande
Ronde water the entity pumps each year.
PBAC is not to the point of funding major projects yet but the need for
research and pilot project dollars continues to increase. If the majority of the support for recharge
and supplemental water projects comes from a fee for Grande Ronde water pumped,
this increases the incentive for reducing pumping from the Grande Ronde aquifer
system, which is needed, and decreases the burden for those who undertake
measures to reduce their use of Grande Ronde water.
Second, PBAC needs to accumulate some matching funds to take advantage of
potential grants, such as the USGS grant which requires a 1 to 1 match and the
WRRI small grants which require a 2:1 matching of which a considerable amount
can be overhead and in-kind.
Third, PBAC needs to talk about how to encourage the major entities to
build the coming increases into future budgets of the cities and
universities. Now is the time to talk
about including budget increases for a year to three years out.
Further out PBAC needs to start accumulating funds for one or more major
projects to actually accomplish the stabilizing of the Grande Ronde aquifer
system water levels. Such projects are
not likely to be cheap. The entities
will not likely be able to pull the funds together on short order.
6. OLD BUSINESS
a. Renewal
of Intergovernmental Agreement -
This continues to be
in process. In the process of routing
it to the six agencies for signatures, several additional technical changes
were needed to meet state and county requirements. Becker will check with WSU for any more needed changes and Moscow
and Latah County will work out the needed changes for Idaho code.
b.
Palouse Basin WRIA –
Kirkland talked to
Rob Buchert of the Palouse Conservation District about where things are in the
application for planning money with Washington DOE for the Palouse Basin Water
Resource Inventory Area (WRIA). The PCD
is almost ready to put in the Planning grant application to WA DOE. They need to collect a few more letters of
participation and support and then they can turn in the application. Rob thought there was an excellent chance
for getting the funding. Rob said he
expecting PBAC to take a more active role in the planning and evaluation
stages. He was hoping that Whitman County or Pullman would take the
lead in the WRIA after the initial funding.
Rob expects to get a consultant to help with both the planning stage and
the evaluation stage.
Bryony Hansen said her work on the Little and Middle Spokane River basin WRIAs
with Golder Associates went very well and resulted in beneficial results.
7.
REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
a.
Exposure in the Communities – Workman gave an update on the Pullman Waste Water
Treatment Plant. They are working with
DOE on their new plant permit. In
discussion, DOE has suggested that Pullman look at use-based criteria, and not
just stay with the present regulatory based criteria. This flowed right into some discussion on the WRIA update, and
also touched on the present regulatory issues that the City of Moscow is
dealing with on their new Waste Water Treatment Plant. Basically, this is going in the right
direction, getting the two States and two sets of Regulators poised to look at
common use-based issues.
8.
NEW BUSINESS
a.
Bryony Hansen related her company’s experience with the Ellensburg
groundwater basin ASR (Aquifer Storage and Recover) work done for the City of
Yakima. Golder Associates did a water
chemistry characterization comparing high flow waters from the Naches River,
that would be treated and then injected into the Ellensburg basin for storage
until needed. CFCs
(Chloroflorocarbons) were used as a signature compound for tracking recent
recharge of ground water into the basin.
Based on the Golder study, Washington DOE approved a pilot scale project
for doing further evaluation of the feasibility of the ASR. Bryony said she would talk to several people
in Golder about making a presentation on the Yakima project to PBAC and other
interested parties.
b.
Scott
King of King Groundwater Science informed the Committee that Washington
Governor Locke has made reform of water policy a top legislative issue for the
coming session. He has four areas that
he wants to give special attention to:
1. Stream flows
2. Water for growing communities
3. Use it or lose it policies
(relinquishment of water rights)
4. Funding for water-storage projects
and drinking water systems.
Various white papers have been submitted and can be seen at http://www.wa.gov/water2002/white_papers.html
9.
NEXT MEETING DATE AND ADJOURNMENT
Thursday, November 15, 2001 at 2:30 pm
McClure Hall Room 411
The meeting was adjourned by consensus.
Respectfully Submitted,
Larry Kirkland
Note: these minutes are submitted
in draft form and have not yet been approved by the Committee.