DRAFT December 20, 2001 Meeting Minutes
University of Idaho, McClure Hall Rm. 411
Members ATtendance
|
X
|
UI: Larry Kirkland,
Facilities Engineer
|
X
|
WSU: Terry Ryan, Energy Manager
|
|
X
|
UI: Jay Becker (Chair),
Assistant Director, Utilities and Engineering
|
X
|
WSU: Pete Grigas,
Facilities Planning
|
|
X
|
Moscow: Tom Scallorn,
Water Dept. Superintendent
|
X
|
Pullman: Mark Workman,
(Vice Chair) Director Public Works
|
|
X
|
Moscow: Steve Busch, City
Council Member
|
|
Pullman: Sue Hinz, City
Council Member
|
|
|
Moscow: Mark Cook,
Director Public Works
|
X
|
Pullman: Art Garro,
Maintenance & Operations Superintendent
|
|
X
|
Latah County: Tom
Townsend, citizen
|
|
Whitman County: Jerry
Finch, County Commissioner
|
|
|
Latah County: Loreca Stauber, County Commissioner Moscow
|
|
Whitman County: Mark
Bordsen, County Planner
|
VISITORS: none
1.
Call to Order AND APPROVAL of OCTOber 18, 2001 Minutes
Jay Becker (Chair) called the meeting to order at 2:43
PM. Minutes for the November 15 meeting
were approved with a name spelling correction.
2. Five Year
Planning Discussion – Kirkland discussed the need to have an
agreed-upon plan that includes all proposed research projects needed to define
the ultimate solution set expected to stabilize the Grande Ronde aquifer water
levels and providing a sustained water supply in the face of area growth. The presence of research projects in PBAC’s
proposal to IDWR appeared to be a significant contributing factor to the Water
Board’s withdrawal of the funding previously proposed as a substitute for the
$100,000 of legislative funds appropriated for PBAC, that IDWR returned to the legislature as part of the Governor’s
holdback. Kirkland said having a
planning document that showed the contribution of research to the ultimate
solution set would strengthen PBAC’s justification of the proposed research and
be a beneficial education tool. There
was general consensus on the annotated outline of work and projects in the
handout, “Thinking on a 5 Year Plan for achieving PBAC long-term goals”. The next step is to fill in more detail for
the proposed research and pilot projects.
3. Idaho
Grant
a.
Status – As mentioned above the state
funds proposed for replacement of the legislative appropriation have
disappeared, at least for the present time, when a portion were needed to use
as a match for federal funds to conduct more robust research projects. Personnel from IDWR did say there is a
chance for reduced funding of a non-reseach project from the Water Board via a
presentation at its February meeting.
Christian Petrich and Hal Anderson both volunteered to review a proposal
for presentation at the February meeting.
Kirkland recommended attempting to structure a proposal that fits the
Water Board criteria that will still facilitate progress toward the PBAC
goals. He stated that the continued
communication is definitely good since there still appears to be a lack of
understanding for what is needed in the Palouse Basin before a major water
supply project is proposed.
b.
Meeting with Idaho
DEQ Personnel at Moscow City Hall - Kerby Cole and Jim Bellatty of
ID DEQ; Bob Haynes from the regional IDWR office in CDA; Steve Busch, Mark Cook
and Gary Riedner from the City of Moscow
and Jim Osiensky and Larry Kirkland from UI attended. Kirkland had sent background and scope of
work documents to Jim Bellatty prior to the meeting. Jim said these help significantly in understanding PBAC’s goals
and where PBAC and the entities are in their progress toward finding solutions
to key unknowns needed to meet PBAC goals.
DEQ open to helping fund the proposed water chemistry and microbiology
study that is the top PBAC research priority at this time. It must be completed before a pilot drainage
well recharge project can be started.
Bellatty indicated that there are funds available to DEQ which could be
used to help undertake the Water Chemistry and Microbilogy study. It was agree that Jim Osiensky would apply
for an IWRRI grant of $15,000, due on the 21 of December and then would work
with DEQ to provide a part of the needed matching funds. Kerby suggested Jim also use a part of
Hudson Mann’s time on the project.
Busch and Kirkland felt the meeting was definitely positive.
c.
How propose to
proceed - Kirkland reported that the loss
of State funds is forcing some difficult decisions. He had encouraged a number of researchers to put together
projects and solicit students based on the fact of the legislative funds and
then the promise of other State monies when the legislative funds were
retracted. Projects were put together
and students lined up. In addition, the
timing factor for two of the proposed projects, the Water Chemistry and
Microbiology Study and the Moscow Mountain Quantity and Quality of Runoff Study
need to get started early in 2002 so that results are available in a timely
fashion for subsequence projects. In
discussions with Jim Osiensky on how to best salvage these projects, Kirkland
proposed considering redirecting OK funds designated for drilling a well until
DEQ and federal funds and/or State legislative funds become available to take
over the project support. The next OK
project report to PBAC will be in January, 2002. There was general consensus for supporting justifiable shuffling
of the funds. These options will be
discussed more at the next PBAC meeting.
3.
EXECUTIVE SECRETARY POSITION – Becker
said formally advertising of the position was in progress. The subcommittee would interview whenever a
suitable candidate for the position was received. In the meantime, details were being worked out so that Eddy
Teasdale, a master’s student in the area until June, could work part time to
help Kirkland. The necessary funds are
available in PBAC’s budget.
4.
ACTION PLANS – Mark Workman and Pullman are to be commended for turning in
a summary of Pullman’s proposed action items for the coming year. The other entities were encouraged to
complete lists of water related action items and turn them in to Kirkland.
5. OLD
BUSINESS
a. Renewal
of Intergovernmental Agreement -
This continues to be
in process. Becker is providing Whitman
County with a new copy of the proposed intergovernmental agreement. Townsend and Kirkland reported that Latah
County is still interested in participating but would prefer a simplified
agreement. Becker suggested that the
four pumping entities proceed to finalize the agreement such that Latah and
Whitman Counties can participate without having to approve the circulated
agreement.
b.
Palouse Basin WRIA –
Kirkland reported
his most recent update from Rob Buchert of the Palouse Conservation
District. Rob said the last letter of
support has been received and PCD was ready
to submit the planning grant application to WA DOE. Rob hoped to fast-track the planning phase
so that application for phase II funding of studies could begin this coming
summer. No time was set for the first
planning session.
6.
REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
a.
Exposure in the Communities –
Pete Grigas
reported that the new WSU well #8 will be drilled next spring on the east side
of the WSU campus. It will replace well
#6 supplying water to the high pressure system. Well #6 will be kept connected as an emergency backup. WSU plans to carefully sample drill cuttings
and log the well to provide valuable information on the subsurface hydrogeology
in that area.
b. Tom
Scallorn reported
that Moscow plans to take well #9 out of service as soon as possible for its 5
year maintenance. This will include
recalibration of the flow meter, rebuilding the pump and possibly logging the
well.
Tom said Moscow was able to cover 70 to 80 percent of the community with leak
detection last summer. The equipment
will recognize leaks down to one gallon per minute.
Tom also reported that Moscow’s water use was down 35 million gallons over the
previous year in spite of the extended lack of precipitation.
The new Waste Water Treatment Plant is performing well in spite of a few
startup mistakes.
c.
Mark Workman reported that WSU is in negotiation with
Parametrics on the scope of work for the design of the proposed recycled water
system. The Washington legislature
provided $250,000 to WSU for the project design. Workman said Pullman is prepared to spend up to an equal amount
toward the design if needed.
Mark also said a new NPDES permit is being drafted for the Pullman WWTP and he
did not expect to have any major problems because Pullman is working with Washington DOE and different
rules are being applied than for Moscow and its NPDES permit application on
Paradise Creek just across the border.
d.
Terry Ryan reported on the status of the proposed WSU
Cogen/Power Plant Upgrade. Trigen is
now looking at a steam production only option as well as a cogen option since
the price for electricity has gone below production costs. The most conservative model appears to still
be too optimistic at this time. In
response to a question about using recycled water in a water cooled system
versus an air cooled system, Terry said an air cooled system would cost about
four times as much as a water cooled system and the air cooled system would
require a much bigger footprint.
7.
NEW BUSINESS
There was no new
business.
8.
NEXT MEETING DATE
Thursday, January 17, 2001 at 2:30 pm
McClure Hall Room 411
The
meeting was adjourned by consensus.
Respectfully
Submitted,
Larry
Kirkland
Note: these minutes are submitted
in draft form and have not yet been approved by the Committee.