July 20, 2000 Meeting Minutes

University of Idaho, McClure Hall Rm. 411

Members ATtendance

X

UI: Larry Kirkland, Facilities Engineer

X

WSU: Craig Benjamin (Chair), Assistant Director of Facilities Operations

X

UI: Jay Becker (Vice-Chair), Assistant Director, Utilities and Engineering

X

WSU: Robert Hengst, Engineering Services Manager

X

Moscow: Gary Presol, Dir. Public Works

X

Pullman: Mark Workman, Dir. Public Works

X

Moscow: Steve Busch, City Council Member

X

Pullman: Sue Hinz, City Council Member

 

Latah County: Loreca Stauber, County Commissioner

 

Whitman County: Les Wigen, County Commissioner

X

Latah County: Tom Townsend, citizen

X

Whitman County: Derek Pohle, County Engineer

X

Executive Secretary and Technical Advisor: Juliet McKenna

 

VISITORS

Bill French (citizen, Moscow), Helena Gregory (UI student and PBAC Summer Conservation Coordinator),  Terry Schierman (City of Pullman Water Department), Jim Osiensky (UI), Landon Beck (UI), Eddy Teasdale (UI), Diane Hopster (UI), Kent Keller (WSU), Roy Mink (Idaho Water Resources Research Institute and UI)

1.      Call to Order AND APPROVAL of June 15, 2000 Minutes

Chair Craig Benjamin called the meeting to order at 2:35 PM.  Minutes were approved with minor editorial changes.  J. Becker motioned to approve the minutes and D. Pohle seconded; motion passed unanimously.

2.      Presentation  “Semiannual Report at the end of Year 1 of the Osiensky-Keller project” 

Kent Keller, WSU hydrology professor, began by presenting two cross sections (one of Moscow area and one of Pullman area) that were completed by his graduate student, Alex Kirk, using available well logs. The cross sections show subsurface lithology in addition to well construction information and will be used by the project team to identify wells that can be monitored during aquifer tests, and that can be sampled for isotopic analysis. 

Diane Hopster, UI graduate student, presented results from her work on mapping and measuring baseflow discharge of springs along Union Flat Creek and South Fork of the Palouse River in Whitman County, Washington.  The slope of the time-discharge plot for a given spring provides information on the size of the area being drained: the steeper the slope, the smaller the area of the  contributing groundwater basin.  This information can then be  used to compare relative lengths of flowlines for the measured  springs.

Landon Beck, UI graduate student, presented nearly a year of results from monitoring water levels in up to 12 wells simultaneously around the basin.  The purpose of his research is (1) to measure water level changes around the basin in response to ongoing pumping, and (2) to conduct opportunistic pump tests using municipal wells while monitoring the responses in non-pumping wells around the basin.  Two such pump tests were conducted since March 2000.  The first test involved pumping Pullman and WSU Grande Ronde (deep) wells for 6 hours.  Monitoring wells outside the city limits (from less than 2 miles away to as far away as Palouse, Albion, Colfax, and Moscow) showed no response.  The other test involved pumping Moscow and UI Grande Ronde wells for 12 hours.  Wanapum (shallow) wells in the Moscow area showed no measurable response.  The water level dropped 0.7 feet in one Grande Ronde well located halfway between Moscow and Pullman (“the DOE well”).  Possible explanations for these results include: 1) the GR may not be well interconnected on a basin-wide scale; 2) the aquifers respond differently in Pullman than in Moscow; and 3) Moscow may be pulling groundwater from the west (towards Pullman) to supply water to its wells.

Jim Osiensky, UI hydrology professor, stated that groundwater pumping has significantly altered the regional gradient.  Instead of calling upon geologic barriers (i.e. folds and faults in the aquifer units), he thinks that aquifer responses can be explained by perturbations to the regional gradient due to municipal groundwater pumping.  The Snake River functions a sink for groundwater in the Grande Ronde aquifer, and the reason there are so few springs visible in the canyon walls may be because hydraulic gradient in the aquifer has reached a steady state with the elevation of the Snake River.

3.      OLD BUSINESS

a)     Groundwater Management Plan Update

J. McKenna reported that she is working on an update to the Plan, and will incorporate the new goals and timeline approved by the Committee earlier this year.  A draft will be distributed for review when it is complete.

b)     Status of Funding Request for IDWR and US Army Corps of Engineers

Roy Mink of Idaho Water Resources Research Institute (IWRRI) on the UI campus has indicated that he is willing to request money for basin research from the state through his proposed budget.  J. McKenna is working with Idaho Department of Water Resources (IDWR) to get the request in their budget, thereby increasing the chances of obtaining funding by submitting two separate requests. The Treasure Valley (Boise area) obtained funding from the state for their multi-year groundwater research project through a similar approach.  Funding obtained this year would be available next fiscal year, beginning July 1, 2001.

L. Kirkland wondered if Roy knew of other funding sources available to PBAC, for example the USGS.  Although he doesn’t know of any currently available federal funds that are applicable to the PBAC, Roy said that next year there may be some national money available through the Water Resource Research Institute (WRRI), and that he and Claudio Stockle of Washington WRRI at WSU may be able to pursue these funds jointly.

J. McKenna reported that Moscow wrote a letter on behalf of PBAC requesting COE assistance with a new basin water resource study.  The next step is to have a meeting with COE personnel, and she encouraged all interested PBAC members to participate in this process.  Details on the meeting will be provided when available.

L. Kirkland reported that he spoke with Al Ames of the Clearwater Economic Development Association about obtaining funding for groundwater research. Larry was told that since Latah County has pulled out of the Association, there was no help available to PBAC.

4.      REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS

a)  Conservation Coordinator Update

Helena Gregory presented the Conservation Coordinator update.  Activities completed to date include:

1.  Creation of display materials for a PBAC Booth and attendance at one Moscow Farmer's Market.

2.  Update PBAC water conservation brochure.  Brochures are being printed.

3.  Meet with City of Moscow to learn about budget and staff for conservation efforts, water audit programs, the biggest water consumers, and the low water use fixture distribution program.

4.  Meet with City of Pullman to learn about any conservation programs in place, availability of funds and staff in the future, the biggest water consumers, bill stuffers, and the possibility of initiating water audit and fixture distribution programs. 

5.  Obtain a list of major water consumers in Pullman for preparation of water audits.

b)     Exposure in the Community

J. McKenna reported that she made a presentation at the Pullman Environmental Quality Commission meeting on July 13 to present ways in which the commission could help the city implement water conservation programs. She discussed adding messages and flyers to the water bills, conservation water and sewer rates, and educational programs in the community and asked for their continued support as these programs evolve in the city.

c)     Update from entities on water- and water conservation-related projects

·           M. Workman:  Pullman will have a “Conserve Water” notice with water conservation tips in the Moscow-Pullman Daily News due to peak demand exceeding system capacity on several occasions this summer.  Major water users include apartment complexes and the school district. C. Benjamin suggested contacting Sue Hinz to distribute this announcement to the WSU campus.

·           D. Pohle:  Whitman County has created a Water Conservancy Board and the Board of County Commissioners appointed three board members and one alternate.  The Board will review and make recommendations to the Washington State Department of Ecology on water right transfer applications in the county. DOE then has 45 days to review the recommendation, at which time if there is not comment from DOE, the recommended action goes through. DOE has encouraged the formation of these boards statewide as a means to alleviate some of the gridlock in the water right transfer system.

·           T. Scallorn:  Moscow Water Department will have a water conservation display in the Chamber of Commerce window during the month of August. There will also be water conservation tips in an upcoming “Ad Mart” publication.  The city has been working with the curricula coordinator for the Moscow Public Schools to incorporate water use and conservation into lesson plans.

·           C. Benjamin: WSU is advertising for an energy efficiency manager, whose job responsibilities will also include water conservation.  J. Becker noted that UI is also advertising for a similar position.

·           G. Presol noted that while on a recent trip to Great Britain, he noticed water conservation is pervasive. For example, showers have a wall heater unit to reduce the time it takes to heat up the water, and toilets have a feature that allows variable quantities of water to be used for each flush.

5.      NEW BUSINESS

a)     Intergovernmental Agreement

The original Intergovernmental (IG) Agreement signed by six entities was valid for 10 years and expired in 1998.  A draft form to renew this agreement was mailed to PBAC members for review.  After review, several members suggested it would be more thorough to simply update and sign the original IG Agreement. J. McKenna will update it, and pass it on to J. Becker for revision.  A draft updated Agreement will be distributed to PBAC members prior to the next meeting. Once all members have reviewed and approved it, it will be signed by all entities.

L. Kirkland was concerned that the original agreement excludes PBAC from certain activities that may be desired in the future (i.e. owning property, purchasing capital, etc).  In the interest of time, it was generally agreed to quickly renew the original IG Agreement and to create a new Agreement in the future if the need arose.

6.      NEXT MEETING DATE AND ADJOURNMENT

 

August 17, 2000 at 2:30 pm in

McClure Hall Room 411.

The meeting was adjourned by consensus at 4:10 p.m.

 

Respectfully Submitted,

 

Juliet M. McKenna

Executive Secretary/Technical Advisor