DRAFT April 15, 2004 Meeting Minutes
University of Idaho, Facilities management Bldg, Jack’s Creek Room
Members ATtendance
|
|
UI:
Michael Holthaus, Water Systems Coordinator |
|
WSU:
Joe Kline, Construction Engineer |
|
X |
UI:
Ken White, Director, Facilities Maintenance and Operations |
X |
WSU:
Rob Corcoran, (Chair), Assistant Director, Arch., Engr & Const Services |
|
X |
Moscow: Tom Scallorn, (Vice-Chair) Water Dept. Superintendent |
X
|
Pullman: Mark Workman, Director Public Works |
|
X
|
Moscow: Peg Hamlett, City Council Member |
|
Pullman: Art Garro, Maintenance & Operations Superintendent |
|
X |
Moscow: Les MacDonald, Director Public Works |
X |
Pullman: Barney Waldrop, City Council Member |
|
X |
Latah County: Tom Townsend, Citizen and Latah County Representative |
|
Whitman County: Mark Storey, County Engineer |
|
X |
Latah
County: Tom Stroschein, County Commissioner |
|
Whitman County: |
|
X |
Emily Adams: City Administrator, City of Colfax |
X |
Andy
Rogers: Public Works Supervisor, City of Colfax |
VISITORS:
Angie Petersen, Drinking Water Analyst, ID DEQ.
1)
Call to Order and Approval of
March 18, 2004 Minutes
Rob Corcoran,
the
PBAC
Chair, called the meeting to order at 2:37 PM. The minutes of the
March
18, 2004
meeting were approved by consensus.
2)
Research Agreements with
Memorandum of Agreement (MOAs)
Kirkland
passed out a draft
PBAC
memorandum of agreement. It is similar to an agreement proposed last fall
before things got side-tracked trying to draw up a legal document for
contractors with
PBAC.
After the proposed legal document for contractors with
PBAC
had been reviewed and approved by UI legal counsel, a meeting between
Jay
Becker,
Peggy Hammel, Larry Kirkland, JoAnn Uberagua and Barbara Vollmer determined that
designating principal investigators or professors as contractors was not going
to work. Kirkland was given the job of redrafting a memorandum of agreement
that would be workable and achieve the PBAC goals of clearly stating the
research or project goals, the milestones, the deliverables, and any important
conditions so that both parties are in agreement before the research or project
begins.
After some discussion, it moved to accept the proposed MOA with the inclusion of
a statement saying payment will be made based on progress in meeting milestones
and the final payment will not be made until the project is complete. Les
MacDonald said he could
not
vote for the motion because he had not had time to adequately review the
document. The motion to accept passed with one decent.
3)
State of Idaho Basin Management
Planning Initiative
The Idaho legislature, in the final days of the 2004 session, passed a bill
directing the Natural Resource Committee members of the Senate and House to
study critical ground water situations in Idaho, including the Palouse Basin,
and report back to the legislature with recommendations for the next session.
Tom Stroschein and Les MacDonald attended the first general session in Boise,
April 14. Karl Dreher, director of the Idaho Department of Water Resources
reviewed pertinent information for critical aquifers throughout the State. Both
the Palouse Basin and the Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer were included in Director
Dreher’s list of basins to be studied. The Natural Resource Committee was then
divided up into 5 subcommittees with each covering at least one problem area of
the state. The North Idaho Subcommittee will be covering the Palouse Basin and
the Rathdrum aquifer. Bob Haynes, the regional manager of IDWR out of Coeur
d’Alene (CDA), and Dale Ralston will be acting as technical advisors to the
North Idaho Subcommittee. The first meeting of the North Idaho Subcommittee
will be April 29 in CDA. Meetings will continue thereafter, at least once a
month, until the problems are understood, the appropriate benchmark data are
gathered, the means of reducing water consumption and using water more
efficiently are defined, and recommendations are agreed upon. Stroschein and
MacDonald were not clear on what the final result would be.
Stroschein said Dreher spoke favorably of the work of PBAC but also presented
the possibility that recharge is having different effects in the Moscow and
Pullman-Colfax areas.
After further discussion it was moved and passed unanimously that Kirkland
contact the North Idaho Subcommittee to request that the Rathdrum Aquifer issues
and the Palouse Basin issues be addressed at separate meetings in their
respective communities.
4)
Discussion of including a
Gravity-Magnetic Study of Basin in next Budget
Kirkland explained that Professor John Oldow, an expert in geophysical methods,
is interested in helping PBAC define the Palouse Basin basement using
geophysical methods. He believes the new instrumentation is now capable of
succeeding where previous instruments failed. Oldow has the necessary equipment
and is willing to supervise a student thesis project that will do the necessary
fieldwork and analyses. An excellent student is available who will be working
with Oldow on geophysical projects in Nevada and Oregon this summer. Kirkland
said this is an timely opportunity to get critical information about the shape
of the basement in a relatively short timeframe that could not get otherwise
gotten without tremendous expense in drilling deep holes. The cost of a
master’s thesis is about $30,000 for 21 months of work spanning two fiscal
years.
After some discussion Kirkland was directed to proceed with soliciting a draft
proposal for an MOA and look into supplemental funding to leverage the PBAC
investment.
5)
Annual Report Draft
Kirkland handed out a draft of the annual report without the graphs and
pictures. Chairman Corcoran asked that comments be returned to Kirkland by the
April 23rd.
6)
Monitoring Well Field Project
Update
Dale Ralston
has put together a specification sheet for bid proposals for the various aspects
of the well field drilling project. He is soliciting quotes from H2O Drilling
out of Coeur
d’Alene. Quotes
from other drillers will also be solicited. When the desired information is
accumulated, it will be presented to
PBAC for direction.
7)
WRIA 34 All-Day Workshop
The workshop consisted of presentations covering the information gathered by the
consultant on the major topics to be addressed in Phase II of the Palouse River
Basin Plan Development. No recommendations were made. A future moderated
session will review previous planning in light of the information gathered.
8)
REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS
a)
Moscow
Water Conservation Hearings
Les
MacDonald
and Tom Scallorn of the City of
Moscow
reported that the City’s water conservation consultant will present a draft
report to the Public Works Finance Committee and then the City Council. In
addition, the Public Works Finance Committee will be making a recommendation to
the City Council on an irrigation season ordinance that will probably limit the
hours available for watering to between
6 PM
and
10 AM.
There will probably be exceptions for businesses, new construction and possibly
parks and schools.
Moscow is also planning to implement an interim tiered water rate billing
structure before the coming irrigation season.
b)
Pullman-WSU
Water Recycling Project
Mark
Workman
and Rob Corcoran reported that both entities want to return to the Washington
legislature with a request for full project even though Washington Governor Lock
line-item vetoed the partial funding appropriation. The reported reason was
that the full funding should be appropriated all at once so as to guarantee the
completion of the water recycling project. The project is number two on WSU’s
capital funding list.
c)
Corcoran also reported that WSU will be taking 5 acres off its irrigation
system this summer to further reduce deep aquifer pumping.
d)
Peg
Hamlett reported that the Palouse Mall will be taking steps to reduce irrigation
needs by using low water need plantings and reducing the amount of grass.
9)
NEXT MEETING DATE
The May PBAC meeting date was corrected to May 20 and the April meeting was
adjourned.
Thursday, May 20, 2004 at 2:30 PM
Pullman
City Hall, Large Conference Room, East End
Respectfully Submitted,
Larry Kirkland
Note: these minutes are
submitted in draft form and have not yet been approved by the Committee.
|