Table 14-3 TOC
General Statistics, for All Industries, by County, 1987 and 1992.
  Establishments[1] Employees Production Workers        
 
       
  Total
(N)		 20 or
more
Empl.
(N)		 N
(1,000s)		 Payroll
($mill.)		 N
(1,000s)		 Hrs
(mill.)		 Wages
($mill.)		 Value
Added
by
Manf.[2]
($mill.)		 Materials
Cost[3]
($mill.)		 Shipment
Value
($mill.)		 New
Capital
Expend.
($mill.)
  1987
 
State of Idaho 1,491 371 52.9 1,148.50 38.3 72.4 698.3 3,057.00 3,957.40 7,004.70 234.8
                       
Ada 284 73 11.1 293.3 6.1 12 117.5 633.7 850.1 1,473.70 48.4
Adams[E1] 16 3 0.2 3.9 0.2 0.3 3.4 8.7 11 19.6 0.1
Bannock 56 14 3.2 85.8 2 3.9 51.6 238.8 355.7 603.3 16.5
Bear Lake[E8] 4 1 D D D D D D D D D
Benewah[E1] 45 11 1.2 26.1 1 2 21.2 35.8 85.5 129 3.4
                       
Bingham 27 9 2.2 38.7 1.8 3.3 26.8 149.9 112.4 262 7.6
Blaine[E4] 33 3 0.2 3.6 0.2 0.3 2.3 13.5 23.5 36.4 0.4
Boise 11 2 0.1 3.5 0.1 0.3 3.1 6.3 15.8 21.9 0.1
Bonner[E1] 110 24 1.8 35.7 1.4 3 27.3 85.9 173.8 258.7 6.1
Bonneville[E1] 66 21 2.7 80.3 1.6 3 38.3 182.6 64.2 247.8 W
                       
Boundary[E2] 38 3 0.4 9.1 0.3 0.6 7.7 19.2 30.6 49.8 1.2
Butte[E9] 2 - D D D D D D D D D
Camas[4]                      
Canyon 114 37 6.8 118.2 4.9 9 70.8 402.3 593.3 989.2 19.7
Caribou 8 2 D D D D D D D D D
                       
Cassia 23 9 1.5 24.7 1.2 2.1 19 112.2 97.5 209.5 D
Clark                      
Clearwater[E1] 59 11 0.9 20.1 0.8 1.6 17 45.4 43.9 82.8 2.6
Custer[E9] 2 - D D D W D D D D D
Elmore[E1] 9 5 0.2 2.6 0.2 0.4 1.9 7.5 9.5 16.7 0.3
                       
Franklin[E1] 10 4 0.2 2.3 0.2 0.3 1.7 11.8 11 22.7 W
Fremont[E3] 13 2 0.2 4.2 0.2 0.4 3.7 12.1 14.6 26.6 0.8
Gem 15 8 D D D D D D D D D
Gooding[E9] 9 - Z 0.4 Z Z 0.2 0.7 0.9 1.7 Z
Idaho[E5] 50 9 1.1 21.9 1 1.8 19.4 45.6 68.8 113.6 D
                       
Jefferson[E5] 16 2 D D D D D D D D D
Jerome 12 4 D D D D D D D D D
Kootenai[E1] 153 33 3.6 67.7 2.7 4.9 40.5 148 149 294.3 13.4
Latah[E2] 42 8 0.6 12.6 0.6 1.1 10.2 25.7 32.6 58.2 1.4
Lemhi[E3] 9 3 0.2 3.2 0.2 0.3 2.4 6.4 11.8 18.1 0.3
                       
Lewis[E3] 8 2 0.1 2.2 0.1 0.2 1.9 4.6 8.7 13.7 D
Lincoln 2 1 D D D D D D D D D
Madison 15 8 1.1 15.1 0.9 1.8 11.7 38.9 37.9 77.1 1.6
Minidoka 13 8 2.1 36.3 1.9 3.5 29.7 88 165.6 254.4 4.4
Nez Perce 50 11 3 89.4 2.2 4.1 63.2 213.6 243.4 461.2 D
                       
Oneida[E2] 3 - D D D D D D D D D
Owyhee 3 - D D D D D D D D D
Payette[E1] 19 8 1.1 19.2 0.8 1.7 11.5 35.8 85.3 119.1 1.8
Power 6 2 D D D D D D D D D
Shoshone[E6] 36 6 0.3 4.8 0.2 0.5 3.6 10.7 15.5 26.2 0.5
                       
Teton[E9] 4 - Z 0.1 Z Z 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 Z
Twin Falls 69 20 2.9 48.8 2.3 4 33.9 151.5 252.2 401.4 10.7
Valley 18 2 0.2 3.3 0.1 0.3 2.9 7.4 16.4 23.7 D
Washington[E1] 9 2 0.2 2.7 0.1 0.3 2.1 6.1 10.4 16.4 0.1
 
  1992
 
State of Idaho 1,883 439 66.2 1,757.70 45.7 91.2 1,023.50 4,532 6,152 10.57 558.3
                       
Ada 370 99 20 635.2 10.3 21.5 257.8 1,230.40 2,178 3,341.10 119.2
Adams 17 4 0.3 8.1 0.3 0.5 7 23.4 24.5 47.7 0.4
Bannock 57 16 3.7 89.5 1.9 3.5 45.2 321.9 210.7 535.7 85.3
Bear Lake 7 3 0.1 2.4 0.1 0.2 1.6 9.5 3 12.3 0.6
Benewah[E2] 62 6 0.9 26.1 0.8 1.8 22.1 52.2 91.7 143.5 3.9
                       
Bingham 36 10 2.3 58.8 1.9 3.9 37 252.5 157.3 411.6 16.8
Blaine[E1] 36 4 0.3 7.9 0.1 0.3 3 21 35.1 54.6 0.8
Boise 10 2 0.1 3.7 0.1 0.2 3.1 8.1 22.5 30.6 0.3
Bonner[E1] 141 18 1.8 41.2 1.4 2.8 28.8 101.5 164.4 267.4 3.1
Bonneville 81 26 4.1 134.7 3 5.9 89.3 374.7 122.1 492.7 4.2
                       
Boundary 44 5 0.5 11.4 0.4 0.7 9.1 32.6 41.9 74.5 1.7
Butte[E9] 1 - D D D D D D D D D
Camas[E9] 2 - D D D D D D D D D
Canyon 122 45 7.5 105.6 6.3 12.3 112.3 505.6 781.8 1,285.70 48.3
Caribou 11 2 D D D D D D D D D
                       
Cassia 26 10 1.6 32 1.3 2.8 24.4 139.6 137.8 277.5 6.3
Clark - - - - - - - - - - -
Clearwater[E1] 66 11 1 27.4 0.8 1.6 19.4 60.8 118.4 173.3 2.4
Custer[E9] 4 - Z 0.1 Z Z Z 0.2 0.2 0.4 Z
Elmore[E9] 10 3 0.3 3.7 0.3 0.5 2.5 13.1 14.2 27.3 D
                       
Franklin 8 3 0.3 5.8 0.2 0.4 3.4 20.2 15.6 35.6 D
Fremont[E8] 17 1 0.1 3.9 0.1 0.3 3.3 10.1 15.4 25.5 0.2
Gem 14 9 D D D D D D D D D
Gooding 13 2 D D D D D D D D 0.5
Idaho[E1] 51 7 0.8 17.8 0.6 1.3 12.6 37.7 42.7 81.3 1.2
                       
Jefferson 15 4 0.7 9.8 0.6 1.1 7.1 21.4 49.3 68.8 D
Jerome[E4] 13 4 D D D D D D D D 1.1
Kootenai[E1] 196 44 3.4 90.5 2.4 4.8 55.8 220.4 243 465.9 11.9
Latah[E1] 63 11 0.7 18.4 0.5 1.1 12.6 42.3 48.8 92.8 2.4
Lemhi 12 2 0.2 3.7 0.1 0.3 2.7 7.9 13.8 21.6 0.3
                       
Lewis 13 4 0.3 7.7 0.3 0.5 6.1 16.1 38.6 53.7 D
Lincoln 2 1 D D D D D D D D D
Madison 27 11 1.3 19.7 1 1.8 12.9 48.9 50.1 98.8 2.8
Minidoka 17 7 2 40.6 1.7 3.6 32.8 147.6 223 351.6 13.3
Nez Perce 60 15 3.4 121.2 2.6 5.3 84 284.9 326.7 612.1 D
                       
Oneida[E5] 5 - Z 0.4 Z Z 0.2 0.8 2.4 3.2 D
Owyhee 5 1 D D D D D D D D 0.2
Payette[E5] 18 9 1.4 26 1 2 16.6 39 82.3 121.6 3.6
Power 10 5 D D D D D D D D D
Shoshone[E4] 36 5 0.3 5.7 0.2 0.4 4.2 14.4 17.3 31.6 0.8
                       
Teton[E2] 5 - Z 0.3 Z Z 0.2 0.6 0.5 1.1 D
Twin Falls 89 24 3.6 73.1 2.9 5.2 49.1 208.7 300.2 501.6 19.6
Valley[E1] 27 2 0.2 4.3 0.1 0.3 3.6 8.6 18.8 27.3 1.2
Washington 14 4 0.3 5.9 0.3 0.6 4.2 20 35.6 55.1 0.6
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, [year] Census of Manufactures, Geographic Area Series, MC[yr]-A-13, 1987, 1992.
Notes: Includes operating manufacturing establishments and auxiliaries. Includes places with 450 (1987) or 500 (1992), manufacturing employees or more.
  Payroll, employment, and sales data for some small single-unit companies with up to 20 employees were obtained from administrative records of other government agencies rather than from census report forms. These data were then used in conjunction with industry averages to estimate the items shown for these small establishments. This technique was also used for other establishments whose reports were not received at time data were tabulated. See notes below for meaning of symbols where estimated data account for 10 percent or more of figures shown.
D Withheld to avoid disclosing individual company confidential data.
Z Represents a number or percent that rounds to less than half the unit of notation shown.
[1] Includes establishments with payroll at any time during the year.
[2] Value added by manufacture is computed using inventory data reported at cost or market prior to any adjustment to LIFO cost. This uniform instruction is a change from prior years (before 1982), in which respondents were permitted to value their inventories using any generally accepted accounting method. Consequently, 1982 data for value added by manufacture are not comparable to prior year data.
[3] Aggregate of cost of materials and value of shipments includes extensive duplication since products of some industries are used as materials by others.
[4] No data provided in source materials for Camas County.
 
[E1] 10-19% [E2] 20-29% [E3] 30-39% [E4] 40-49% [E5] 50-59%
[E6] 60-69% [E7] 70-79% [E8] 80-89% [E9] 90% or more  

Originally compiled by: Bill Clark and Barbara Greever
Updated by: Lily Wai
Data input assisted by: Michal McRenolds
Contact: Lily Wai